In chapter 4 of Caro’s Book of Poker Tales, Mike Caro adds a set of “general” tells and concepts that don’t fit neatly into the earlier categories, and he shows how to connect them to the same underlying logic: opponents reveal what they want, what they fear, and who they’re really targeting.
Choosing Your Seat
Caro argues that seat selection is a major profit lever, not superstition. Because action moves clockwise, position determines who you get to act after and who gets to act after you.
Key strategic ideas he emphasizes:
-
Sit to the left of loose, passive players so they invest money before you act and you can isolate or raise with better information.
-
Sit to the left of aggressive, skilled players so they must act first and can’t constantly pressure you.
-
In blind games, it can be valuable to sit:
-
right of players who don’t defend their blinds enough (so you can steal),
-
and left of players who don’t attack blinds often (so you keep blinds/antes more easily).
-
When you don’t know player tendencies yet, Caro recommends a practical tell-based rule: choose a seat that puts the biggest stacks (and especially the loosest-looking money) to your right, because you’ll have more chances to win chips from players who act before you.
Conflicting Tells
Caro explains that sometimes opponents show mixed signals at the same time. His solution is simple: conflicting tells usually mean partial acting.
How to interpret it:
-
The most obvious, attention-grabbing gesture is often the “performance” meant for you to notice.
-
The quieter, background behavior is more likely to be unconscious and honest.
So if someone pretends to fold or look away, but their eyes track the action or a hand creeps toward chips, Caro treats that as a strong clue they’re setting up aggression (often a raise) and trying not to scare you off.
Gaining Information
Caro encourages actively eliciting tells rather than waiting passively.
His main theme: if you apply pressure—especially by acting confident and in control—many opponents respond with primitive acting (trying to look strong or weak), which creates clearer tells.
He describes two common “information plays”:
-
Fake-bet motion: reaching toward chips as if you’ll bet, then watching whether the opponent threatens (often indicating they want you to check) or looks away/unthreatening (often indicating they’re ready to spring a trap).
-
Fake-call motion: reaching as if to call when facing a bet, to see if the bettor:
-
hesitates, double-checks, or then bets with extra force (often signaling weakness/bluff),
-
or stays smooth and unbothered (more consistent with real strength).
-
Caro warns this is powerful but should be used sparingly, because overuse teaches opponents what you’re doing.
Misdirected Bets
Caro introduces a particularly clean “logic tell”: who the bettor aims the bet at.
Core idea:
-
A strong hand wants action from the most dangerous-looking opponent—the one most likely to call or pay off.
-
If a bettor targets attention and chips toward the least threatening player, Caro says it often means the bettor is trying to make the real threat feel irrelevant and fold.
So, a bet that seems “aimed past” the strongest opponent and directed at a weaker one is treated as highly suspicious and frequently a bluff.
Main Takeaway
Chapter 3 teaches that tells aren’t just body language during a hand—they’re also position choices, mismatched signals, deliberate information-gathering moves, and the logic of whom bets are truly directed at. Caro’s overall message is that if you watch carefully and think about motives, you can turn small behaviors into big decisions: where to sit, when to fold, when to bet, and when to snap-call a likely bluff.