Chapter 5 of PLO From Scratch: 4-betting and Defending Against a 4-bet

PLO from Scratch Summary Cover

In chapter 5 of PLO From Scratch, Bugs develops a mathematically grounded framework for 4-betting and defending against 4-bets with 100BB stacks, showing that these situations are largely governed by pot odds, equity thresholds, and hand structure rather than guesswork.


Why 4-Bet Pots Are Technically Simple (but Crucial)

With pot-sized raises up to the 4-bet, stacks are structured so that:

  • Only one pot-sized bet remains after the 4-bet.

  • Postflop play usually reduces to a single all-in decision on the flop.

  • Correct play can be analyzed using pot odds and flop equity distributions.

Because of this low SPR structure, many 4-bet scenarios are mathematically “cut-and-dried.” That makes them important and relatively easy to fix if leaks exist (for example, folding too often on flops in 4-bet pots).


Part I: 4-Betting

When Should You 4-Bet Light?

Bugs begins with a key contrast:

  • Against a player who 3-bets only AAxx, light 4-betting is generally incorrect.

  • Against a player who 3-bets a wide range (speculative and bluff hands), light 4-betting becomes attractive.

The logic is simple:

  • If Villain rarely holds AAxx,

  • and your hand performs well versus non-AAxx ranges,

  • inflating the pot removes positional disadvantage and reduces Villain’s implied odds.

Additionally, holding an ace reduces the probability Villain holds AAxx by half, which further supports selective light 4-betting.


Defining a “Loose” 3-Betting Range

Using combinatorial analysis (via ProPokerTools), Bugs establishes benchmarks:

  • ~2.5% 3-bet → likely only AAxx.

  • ~5% 3-bet → balanced premium range (AAxx + premium Broadway + strong speculative hands).

  • ~6.5–7% → includes all AAxx and strong non-AAxx hands.

  • 10%+ → clearly wide, including medium/rough speculative hands.

This statistical framework allows you to decide whether light 4-betting is justified.

If a player’s 3-bet percentage exceeds the 5–7% “premium threshold,” you can reasonably assume significant non-AAxx content in his range.


A Core Light 4-Betting Range

Against loose 3-bettors, Bugs proposes a structured expansion beyond AAxx.

Core 4-betting range:

  • All AAxx.

  • Premium non-AAxx high-card hands such as AKKx, AQQx, and strong AKxx—preferably suited to the ace and Broadway-heavy.

Conceptually, this is similar to 4-betting KK/QQ/AK in Hold’em rather than only AA.

This range:

  • Is still heavily weighted toward AAxx.

  • Contains a small percentage of premium non-AAxx hands for balance and pressure.


Facing a 5-Bet After Light 4-Betting

With 100BB stacks, calling a 5-bet is a pot-odds decision.

Required equity: ~31%.

Premium double-suited AKKx/AQQx/AKxx hands:

  • Are slightly profitable or near break-even versus random AAxx.

  • Become slightly worse versus only premium AAxx.

  • Still do not create large EV errors either way.

Conclusion: You can call without fear of major mistakes, especially if Villain sometimes 5-bets wider than AAxx.


What Light 4-Betting Accomplishes

Light 4-betting:

  1. Reduces opponents’ implied odds.

  2. Simplifies postflop play (often allowing automatic flop shoves).

  3. Reduces positional disadvantage.

  4. Forces opponents to adjust (which may benefit you).

Even small equity shifts matter when stacks are committed so early.


Part II: Defending Against a 4-Bet (Likely AAxx)

This is the more common and practically important scenario.

Core Defensive Strategy

When facing a 4-bet with 100BB stacks:

  1. Assume Villain has AAxx.

  2. 5-bet AAxx all-in.

  3. Call with hands that:

    • Perform well against AAxx.

    • Can commit profitably on flops with ≥31% equity.

Postflop plan: commit on flops where equity meets the threshold; fold otherwise.


Mathematical Model for Calling a 4-Bet

After calling a 4-bet:

  • 25.5BB invested.

  • 31% equity needed to call flop shove.

EV formula balances:

  • Flops where you fold.

  • Flops where you commit with sufficient equity.

This framework allows precise comparison of hand types.


Which Hands Can Call a 4-Bet?

1. Value 3-Bet Hands

High Double Pairs (Double-Suited)

Hands like strong KKxx/QQxx/JJxx with connectivity:

  • Often profitable calls.

  • Perform better when double-suited.

  • Lower pairs sometimes outperform higher pairs due to reduced straight-blocking from AAxx.

Single-Suited High Pairs

  • Frequently marginal or negative EV.

  • Suitedness is critical.

Ace-Heavy Hands (Axxx)

These perform poorly:

  • Effectively become 3-card hands versus AAxx.

  • Unpaired ace-high Broadway wraps should be folded.

  • AKKx and similar hands struggle unless very well coordinated and double-suited.

Conclusion: Most Axxx hands should fold.


2. Speculative 3-Bet Hands

Suited Rundowns

These are extremely robust versus AAxx.

  • Double-suited rundowns perform very well.

  • Even single-suited versions are profitable.

  • Gaps matter far less than expected.

  • Straight potential not blocked by AAxx is crucial.

Suited Ace + Rundown

  • Double-suited versions are profitable.

  • Single-suited versions are marginal.

Conclusion: Rundowns are ideal 4-bet defense hands.


3. Bluff 3-Bet Hands

Even rough but suited and coordinated rundowns perform surprisingly well against AAxx in 4-bet pots.

However:

  • Their robustness applies specifically heads-up versus AAxx.

  • In multiway pots, limited nut potential becomes problematic.


Example: Counting Outs vs Top Set

Bugs illustrates defensive logic with a flop example:

  • Pair + flush draw + gutshot versus likely top set.

  • Some outs are dead.

  • Discount outs to account for Villain improving.

  • Adjust to reflect realistic equity (~35% in example).

Key takeaway: calm, rational equity estimation is critical in high-variance spots.


Multiway 4-Bet + 5-Bet Scenario

An important advanced insight:

When two opponents both likely hold AAxx in a 3-way all-in:

  • They block each other’s outs.

  • A coordinated speculative hand can become a favorite.

  • Required equity may be only ~29%.

  • Certain speculative hands have 40%+ equity.

This makes calling extremely profitable, even with hands that look weak at first glance.


Major Strategic Conclusions

1. 4-Betting

  • Expand beyond AAxx only against loose 3-bettors.

  • Use ace blockers strategically.

  • Keep range heavily weighted toward AAxx.

  • Accept small EV edges when calling 5-bets.

2. Defending Against 4-Bets

Call with:

  • Double-suited high pairs with connectivity.

  • Suited, coordinated rundowns (especially double-suited).

Fold:

  • Most unpaired Axxx.

  • Weak, uncoordinated pairs.

3. Rundowns Are Structurally Strong

Rundowns:

  • Hit many flops.

  • Retain equity against AAxx.

  • Are ideal tools for defending against 4-bets.

4. Suitedness Matters

Double-suited hands frequently swing from marginal to clearly profitable.


Final Thoughts

Chapter 5 closes the preflop portion of the series by demonstrating that 4-bet situations with 100BB stacks are largely mechanical:

  • Know the equity threshold.

  • Know which structures perform well.

  • Commit correctly.

  • Accept variance calmly.

Bugs emphasizes repetition and disciplined execution over creativity. Once the math is understood, 4-bet play becomes one of the cleaner and more manageable areas of PLO strategy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *